[talk-au] Rock Overhangs
Warin
61sundowner at gmail.com
Sun Mar 31 22:07:31 UTC 2019
I object.
amenity=shelter I see as a man made object, some with better shelter
than others.
I think these should remain in the 'natural key space, possibly
natural=overhang?
But then what do I know???
amenity=shelter has
shelter_type
<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shelter_type>=rock_shelter - A
rock shelter is a shallow cave-like opening at the base of a bluff or cliff
and that looks to fit perfectly!
I'd not tag them as camp sites, let people evaluate them and the
surrounds themselves for camping rather than suggest a place.
On 01/04/19 08:39, Andrew Harvey wrote:
>
> > when (how deep) does a rock overhang / shelter become an actual cave? :-)
>
> Some judgement is needed, but the ones I've seen are pretty clear cut
> as being one or the other.
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dshelter just says "A
> shelter <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shelter_%28building%29> is small
> place to protect against bad weather conditions." which is mostly what
> these overhangs are used for, so I think it's the appropriate tag. If
> that shelter is frequently used as a camp site (now, not just
> historically) then can be tagged tourism=camp_site with a few extra
> tags from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism=camp_site to
> help distinguish this small camp site from the larger ones.
>
>
> Is "not meant for sleeping, no cooking or heating equipement inside"
> supposed to be a criteria for a shelter?
>
> I would say no. We should tag the rock overhang for what it is, and
> use tourism=camp_site to say if it's commonly used for sleeping too.
>
>
> On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 at 08:07, Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefitz1 at gmail.com
> <mailto:graemefitz1 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, 31 Mar 2019 at 18:14, Andrew Harvey
> <andrew.harvey4 at gmail.com <mailto:andrew.harvey4 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Rock overhangs (rock shelters) have been quite extensively
> mistagged in Australia as natural=cave_entrance.
>
> Are there any objections to re-tagging these overhangs tagged
> as natural=cave_entrance to amenity=shelter +
> shelter_type=rock_shelter?
>
>
> No real objection, Andrew, but when (how deep) does a rock
> overhang / shelter become an actual cave? :-)
>
> Also noticed in the discussion comments on
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shelter_type
>
>
> "Can you look if this could be tagged as a
> shelter ?http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Champlitte,_%C3%A9craigne.jpgTounoki
> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=User:Tounoki&action=edit&redlink=1>(talk
> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tounoki&action=edit&redlink=1>)
> 14:16, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
>
> If it is open to the public, not meant for sleeping, no
> cooking or heating equipement inside, then yes, you could use
> amenity
> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:amenity>=shelter
> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dshelter> +shelter
> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shelter>=weather_shelter
> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:shelter%3Dweather_shelter&action=edit&redlink=1>"
>
> Is "not meant for sleeping, no cooking or heating equipement
> inside" supposed to be a criteria for a shelter?
>
> Some of the overhangs I've seen are pitch black underneath from
> many thousands of years of cooking fires, & are acknowledged as
> places that Aboriginal peoples camped during bad weather - does
> that mean they're not shelters? (although I don't know what else
> they would then be?)
>
> Thanks
>
> Graeme
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20190401/9f8e9954/attachment.html>
More information about the Talk-au
mailing list