[Talk-hu] Entrance signs - ref, addr:flats, ref:signed=no tags
Attila Kun
attila at attilakundev.com
2022. Jún. 30., Cs, 19:26:53 UTC
Would it be acceptable to add ref=A to entrance=main in such case?
Probably, but *only *in that case. if it's something like 15/c then we
have to keep that address.
What I mentioned was in special cases.
However I want the opinion of vasony or vmiklos because they know the
addressing structures well (vasony usually repairs wrong addresses,
vmiklos has a project for missing addresses
(https://osm-gimmisn.vmiklos.hu/osm) that we need to look for)
On 2022. 06. 30. 13:35, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> To confirm things:
>
> Lets say there is:
>
> > ???? Street 4-6. Building A, Staircase A
>
> with entrance=main that is without addr:housenumber
>
> Would it be acceptable to add ref=A to entrance=main in such case?
>
> Or would it be considered as invalid/unwanted?
>
> > https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1419165875
>
> So in Hungary staircase code is considered as part of a housenumber?
> In all cases? Only same?
>
> (for example in Poland it would not be)
>
> 29 cze 2022, 19:24 od attila at attilakundev.com:
>
> Hi Mateusz & others,
>
> As far as I know, yes, there are actually seperate "staircase
> letters".
>
> I'm going to cite this article from
> https://masodikkerulet.hu/archiv/cimkezelesi-eljarassal-kapcsolatos-kozzetetel-2
> :
>
> "The correct addressing would be this:
>
> *1024 Budapest, Káplár utca 4-6. A épület, A, B, C, D lépcsőház, B
> épület A, B, C lépcsőház*
>
> *1024 Budapest, Fillér utca 8-12. A, B, C, D lépcsőház"*
>
> Based upon this, yes this thing exists.
> Based on that: 1024 Budapest, Káplár utca 4-6. A épület, A lépcsőház.
> = 1024 Budapest, Káplár Street 4-6. Building A, Staircase A
> But there are other examples as well. Like at Örs vezér tere
> (Fehér út), there is a big office building, which has two
> staircases: Staircase A and staircase B.
>
> You would see such things like "Fehér út 1. B. lph.", lph is the
> abbreviation of lépcsőház (staircase)
>
> Hopefully my explanation is useful.
>
> BR,
> Attila
>
> On 2022. 06. 29. 12:02, Feri Veres wrote:
>>
>> Hi Mateusz,
>>
>> Earlier I've mapped many big buildings as explained in this
>> comment, but as I can see them on the map, they had the
>> "staircase letter" as*part of their house number*. So no special
>> addr:unit or other tag was needed. Or every normal entrance had
>> their own house number. Examples:
>>
>> New building: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1541562620
>>
>> Old building: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1419165875 (I
>> make such address nodes part of the building line.)
>>
>> (The comment refers to both old and new - so in this area at
>> Budapest these are not numbered as the comment explains. However
>> I can imagine such house. In that case I would mark the building
>> outline with the number (Address) and the entrances
>> just*entrance=* + ref=* *maybe.)
>>
>> Another city, same style:
>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6703947891
>>
>> I have not seen such "range of flats" marked, as in original
>> question. I didn't answer because I don't know if they exist
>> anywhere in Hungary. *Then how could anybody say such houses do
>> not exist?* :-) But if they are rare, I think this is not a good
>> "question" in StreetComplete. I do not remember seeing or mapping
>> such "rage of flats" ever.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Feri
>> 2022. 06. 29. 9:16 keltezéssel, Mateusz Konieczny írta:
>>> interesting, based on
>>> https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/issues/3064#issuecomment-1159088130
>>> I enabled this quest in Hungary
>>>
>>> They mentioned staircase designators, so I enabled it.
>>>
>>> if this quest will turn out to be mistake here, then I will
>>> disable it.
>>>
>>> Is addr:unit tagged on entrance=staircase? Or on address nodes?
>>> Or on something else?
>>>
>>> 28 cze 2022, 12:29 od gabor.babos at gmail.com:
>>>
>>> Hello Mateusz,
>>>
>>> sorry for the late answer. Though I do not live in an area
>>> with big block houses, as far as I know flat numbers are not
>>> written outside on buildings in Hungary.
>>>
>>> Staircases are often numbered and visible also from the
>>> street but for them addr:unit
>>> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr#Detailed_subkeys>
>>> tags are used.
>>>
>>> Maybe others with more experience will correct me.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>>
>>> /Gábor Babos/
>>>
>>> Mateusz Konieczny <matkoniecz at tutanota.com> ezt írta
>>> (időpont: 2022. jún. 16., Cs, 16:24):
>>>
>>> Hello and sorry for writing in English. I am
>>> implementing something in StreetComplete
>>> and I want to ask is it something that should be enabled
>>> in Hungary.
>>>
>>> Is it typical that entrance in an apartment with
>>> multiple entrance will have:
>>>
>>> - signed range of flats, for example addr:flats=81-94 on
>>> entrance to
>>> staircase with flats 81 to 94
>>> and/or
>>> - ref=VI on entrance to staircase with code VI
>>>
>>> Example from Poland:
>>> https://www.google.pl/maps/@50.0202346,19.9033715,3a,42.4y,202.36h,95.55t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sxM7gDCmkjQPWpvJaXWIG9A!2e0!5s20140601T000000!7i13312!8i6656
>>>
>>> I am asking as I am unsure whether this quest should be
>>> enabled in your area or not.
>>>
>>> It would result in tagging ref or addr:flats or ref and
>>> addr:flats or ref:signed=no
>>> on entrances of building=apartments which have more than
>>> one tagged
>>> entrance=main or entrance=staircase
>>>
>>> For reference, work on this is tracked in
>>> https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/issues/3064
>>>
>>> Pull requests is at
>>> https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/pull/4066
>>>
>>> It will be enabled in Poland, Bulgaria, Russia, Ukraine,
>>> Belarus, Estonia.
>>>
>>> It will be not enabled in Kosovo, Serbia, Lithuania,
>>> Slovakia and Czech Republic
>>> as such signs are not in use there.
>>>
>>> If you have some feedback about StreetComplete - the
>>> best place to report it is
>>> https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/issues
>>> but you can also ping me in this thread for next few days.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Talk-hu levelezőlista
>>> Talk-hu at openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-hu
>>> Leiratkozás a fenti címen vagy
>>> <talk-hu-request at openstreetmap.org> címre egy levél,
>>> témája "unsubscribe", tartalma mindegy.
>>>
>>>
>
>
--------- következő rész ---------
Egy csatolt HTML állomány át lett konvertálva...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-hu/attachments/20220630/3ee44f14/attachment-0001.htm>
További információk a(z) Talk-hu levelezőlistáról