[Talk-us-massachusetts] Massgis address points with status "not found"

[Alan & Ruth Bragg]

Greg, If you select all the nodes stacked at 117 Great Road (the shopping
center) you'll find these "unit" numbers and their massgis status. I'm
comfortable with the status "Active" but don't understand  "Linked" . The
Unit 11A at 117 Great Road is the one "not found"
7 LINKED
3 ACTIVE
16 LINKED
ACTIVE
11 LINKED
13 LINKED
5 ACTIVE
6 LINKED
D ACTIVE
18 LINKED
8 LINKED
4 ACTIVE
17 LINKED
2 ACTIVE
11A NOT_FOUND
14 LINKED
10 LINKED
15 LINKED
208 ACTIVE
12 LINKED
9 LINKED

Until we know more about these status codes, I wouldn't want to add
anything to OSM other than those marked "Active" that have a
centroid matching a building.

Alan


On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 5:29 PM Greg Troxel <gdt at lexort.com> wrote:

>
> None of those were in the set of points provided by Yury as really
> really not matching osm.
>
> Reading that list, the street names are all familiar.  Most of the
> addresses are not familiar (but they are likely just houses or
> somethihng that used to me, so they wouldn't be).
>
> But, 117 Great Road is a real address, of the shopping center in Lower
> Village.  It shows up that way in the L3 Parcels layer Jason made.
>
> Picking on 90-92 Packard for no apparent reason, there is a lot labeled
> 90-92 on L3, and there are (DG sez) two structures there, of which one
> is clearly a house and the other probably a garage.  So maybe they mean
> that from the L3 db, the value 90-92 is suspect and they came up with 92
> for the address point.  Really hard to say.
>
> Picking on 341 Sudbury, again semi-randomly, there is a 339 and a 343 on
> L3, but no 341 lot (as of then).
>
> So I think they had some things that maybe existed, and they decided
> they didn't, and so far they don't look really confused.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us-massachusetts/attachments/20180810/eb0c03e2/attachment.html>