[OSM-talk] Hitting reset on talk-au

80n 80n80n at gmail.com
Mon Jul 11 16:40:18 BST 2011

Sorry this was supposed to be copied to legal-talk, not the osm-fork list.

On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 4:35 PM, 80n <80n80n at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Michael Collinson <mike at ayeltd.biz>wrote:
>> **
>> If it is UK Ordnance Survey data that is the issue, we now have direct
>> clarification from them that they have no objection to continued
>> distribution of data derived from their OS OpenData under under the ODbL. At
>> the moment, this excludes Code-Point Open, (postcode) data. Hope that helps.
> The statement from the OS did not specify what content license was to be
> used for their content.  They did not explicitly mention that their content
> could be included using the DbCL.
> My understanding is that the OpenData license would be the one that was
> applicable unless a more permissive license was *explicitly* granted by
> them, which it was not.
> Is this a correct reading of how things stand at the moment or have OS
> subsequently clarified that they are happy for their content to be licensed
> using DbCL within a database that is protected by ODbL?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20110711/57c4de21/attachment.html>

More information about the talk mailing list