[OSM-talk] OSM OSM (or OSMSM (or something else better?))

Marc Gemis marc.gemis at gmail.com
Sun Apr 26 10:12:16 UTC 2015


Nice ideas, but impossible to realise IMHO.

try finding a good rendering for

highway = residential
maxweight = 7.5
cycleway:left = track
cycleway:right = lane
sideway=both
lanes = 5
lanes:forward=2
lanes:backward =3
lanes:bus:forward=1
turn:lanes:backward=left|through|right
lit = yes

and perhaps add some access rules to the mix as well.
and some parking lanes

I constantly have to toggle different styles in JOSM to keep a clear
picture of what's going on.

Or didn't you mean "everything" with "everything" :-)

I think you are not the first one with this idea, but as usual "who is
going to do it"
I guess the team behind the map is welcoming extra help, but they also have
other priorities than showing everything (that's what I've read somewhere)

regards

m

On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 11:47 PM, pmailkeey . <pmailkeey at googlemail.com>
wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> OpenStreetMap =*O* *S*tandard *M*ap
>
> MapForTheRenderer=yes | I think the standard map should define how osm
> data is displayed (not what is displayed)*1
> DisplayEverything=yes | I think the standard map should display all data*2
> DisplayOptions=yes | I think the standard map should offer the viewer the
> options to not display data types and features - such as labels / symbols /
> both / neither.*3
> Preset standard maps*4
>
> *1 The SM should allow zoom in to two adjacent buildings such that the
> text for [name] for both is clearly and fully displayed. It should define
> what areas mask other areas. It should not define what symbols are used
> though.
> *2 I think the SM should be capable of displaying the entire contents of
> OSM
> *3 The SM should offer users a means of not showing certain information -
> for preferences and clarity.
> *4 Preset standard map options should be available - such as cycling shows
> the cycling info but still using standard map symbols. It should also allow
> the user to add or remove displayed data - just like the 'normal' standard
> map does.
>
>
> This should not interfere with user groups designing their own maps and
> symbols driven by osm data but merely allow a standard map view of the
> user's selected data.
>
> Them's my thoughts !
> --
> Mike.
> @millomweb <https://sites.google.com/site/millomweb/index/introduction> -
> For all your info on Millom and South Copeland
> via *the area's premier website - *
>
> *currently unavailable due to ongoing harassment of me, my family,
> property & pets*
>
> T&Cs <https://sites.google.com/site/pmailkeey/e-mail>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20150426/bdf17d4b/attachment.html>


More information about the talk mailing list