December 2011 Archives by thread

• Messages sorted by: [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Thu Dec 1 00:33:19 GMT 2011
Ending: Wed Dec 28 10:59:42 GMT 2011
Messages: 101

• [OSM-legal-talk] ODbL and publishing source data   James Livingston
  • [OSM-legal-talk] ODbL and publishing source data   Jonathan Harley
• [OSM-legal-talk] remapping with anonymous public trace   maning sambale
  • [OSM-legal-talk] remapping with anonymous public trace   Stephan Knauss
    • [OSM-legal-talk] remapping with anonymous public trace   maning sambale
• [OSM-legal-talk] Poland   Simon Poole
  • [OSM-legal-talk] Poland   Simon Poole
    • [OSM-legal-talk] Poland   Frederik Ramm
• [OSM-legal-talk] OSM Database Re-Build   Robin Paulson
• [OSM-legal-talk] Copyright status of OSM map data - publishable memo for USA   Ed Avis
  • [OSM-legal-talk] Copyright status of OSM map data - publishable memo for USA   80n
    • [OSM-legal-talk] Copyright status of OSM map data - publishable memo for USA   80n
    • [OSM-legal-talk] Copyright status of OSM map data - publishable memo for USA   andrzej zaborowski
      • [OSM-legal-talk] Copyright status of OSM map data - publishable memo for USA   Ed Avis
  • [OSM-legal-talk] Copyright status of OSM map data - publishable memo for USA   Frederik Ramm
    • [OSM-legal-talk] Copyright status of OSM map data - publishable memo for USA   Simon Poole
      • [OSM-legal-talk] Copyright status of OSM map data - publishable memo for USA   Ed Avis
  • [OSM-legal-talk] Copyright status of OSM map data - publishable memo for USA   80n
• [OSM-legal-talk] Google Maps UK - some legal angles   Richard Fairhurst
• [OSM-legal-talk] Copyright status of OSM map data - publishable memo for USA   80n
• [OSM-legal-talk] Fwd: [Foundation-l] Creative Commons wants your input on the 4.0 license process   Mike Dupont
  • [OSM-legal-talk] Fwd: [Foundation-l] Creative Commons wants your input on the 4.0 license process   Mike Linksvayer
• [OSM-legal-talk] License Change View on OSM Inspector   Frederik Ramm
• [OSM-legal-talk] I am not going to remove any old node in my hometown   FK270673 at fantasymail.de
  • [OSM-legal-talk] I am not going to remove any old node in my hometown   Simon Poole
  • [OSM-legal-talk] I am not going to remove any old node in my hometown   Jo
  • [OSM-legal-talk] I am not going to remove any old node in my hometown   Peter Miller
• [OSM-legal-talk] Licensing the license   Michael Collinson
  • [OSM-legal-talk] Licensing the license   Rob Myers
  • [OSM-legal-talk] Licensing the license   Erik Johansson
• [OSM-legal-talk] Low-edit decliners   Richard Weait
• [OSM-legal-talk] [OSM-talk] An example of the complications inherent in determining tainted ways   andrzej zaborowski
• [OSM-legal-talk] Are objects still tainted when they are edited from a better source ?   Jean-Marc Liotier
  • [OSM-legal-talk] Are objects still tainted when they are edited from a better source ?   Dermot McNally
• [OSM-legal-talk] Anonymous nodes edited supporting way   Pierre-Alain Dorange
  • [OSM-legal-talk] Anonymous nodes edited supporting way   Richard Fairhurst
    • [OSM-legal-talk] Anonymous nodes edited supporting way   Pierre-Alain Dorange
• [OSM-legal-talk] instead of replacing data can I just revert to the last known "clean" version?   maning sambale
  • [OSM-legal-talk] instead of replacing data can I just revert to the last known "clean" version?   Frederik Ramm
    • [OSM-legal-talk] instead of replacing data can I just revert to the last known "clean" version?   Ed Avis
      • [OSM-legal-talk] instead of replacing data can I just revert to the last known "clean" version?   Frederik Ramm
      • [OSM-legal-talk] instead of replacing data can I just revert to the last known "clean" version?   Ed Avis
      • [OSM-legal-talk] instead of replacing data can I just revert to the last known "clean" version?   andrzej zaborowski
    • [OSM-legal-talk] instead of replacing data can I just revert to the last known "clean" version?   Steve Bennett
      • [OSM-legal-talk] instead of replacing data can I just revert to the last known "clean" version?   Frederik Ramm
      • [OSM-legal-talk] instead of replacing data can I just revert to the last known "clean" version?   Simon Poole
    • [OSM-legal-talk] instead of replacing data can I just revert to the last known "clean" version?   Apollinaris Schoell
    • [OSM-legal-talk] instead of replacing data can I just revert to the last known "clean" version?   Hendrik Oesterlin
• [OSM-legal-talk] A gradual transition to ODbL   FK270673 at fantasymail.de
• [OSM-legal-talk] [OSM-talk] Relations and the license change   Frederik Ramm
• [OSM-legal-talk] [OSM-talk] Transition to CC-4 instead of destroying data   Mike Dupont
  • [OSM-legal-talk] [OSM-talk] Transition to CC-4 instead of destroying data   Jo
• [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested   Richard Weait
  • [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested   Apollinaris Schoell
    • [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested   Jean-Marc Liotier
      • [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested   Richard Weait
      • [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested   Jean-Marc Liotier
      • [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested   ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen
      • [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested   Simon Poole
      • [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested   Martin Koppenhoefer
  • [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested   Hendrik Oesterlin
  • [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested   andrzej zaborowski
    • [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested   Ed Avis
      • [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested   andrzej zaborowski
  • [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested   Ed Avis
  • [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested   Ed Avis
    • [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested   Simon Poole
      • [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested   Ed Avis
      • [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested   Simon Poole
      • [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested   Ed Avis
      • [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested   Simon Poole
      • [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested   Ed Avis
      • [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested   Simon Poole
      • [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested   Ed Avis
      • [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested   mike at ayeltd.biz
      • [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested   Ed Avis
      • [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested   mike at ayeltd.biz
      • [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested   Ed Avis
      • [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested   mike at ayeltd.biz
  • [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested   Ed Avis
  • [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested   Frederik Ramm
    • [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested   Dermot McNally
      • [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested   Frederik Ramm
      • [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested   Dermot McNally
      • [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested   Frederik Ramm
      • [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested   Dermot McNally
    • [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested   Frederik Ramm
    • [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested   andrzej zaborowski
      • [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested   Frederik Ramm
      • [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested   andrzej zaborowski
    • [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested   Robert Whittaker (OSM)
      • [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested   Frederik Ramm
      • [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested   Richard Weait
      • [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested   Frederik Ramm
• [OSM-legal-talk] Apologies for misleading munin graphs   Frederik Ramm
• [OSM-legal-talk] [OSM-talk] New rules for OSMI license change view   Frederik Ramm
• [OSM-legal-talk] There is no copyright on way tags like street names   FK270673 at fantasymail.de
  • [OSM-legal-talk] There is no copyright on way tags like street names   Jo
    • [OSM-legal-talk] There is no copyright on way tags like street names   Frederik Ramm
  • [OSM-legal-talk] There is no copyright on way tags like street names   andrzej zaborowski
    • [OSM-legal-talk] There is no copyright on way tags like street names   John Smith

Last message date: Wed Dec 28 10:59:42 GMT 2011
Archived on: Wed Dec 28 11:00:11 GMT 2011

• Messages sorted by: [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...